Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended November 2, 2013

or

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 001-35720

RESTORATION HARDWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 924-1005

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of December 10, 2013, 38,905,743 shares of registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

RESTORATION HARDWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

PART I

RESTORATION HARDWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents

RESTORATION HARDWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

RESTORATION HARDWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

RESTORATION HARDWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

RESTORATION HARDWARE HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1—THE COMPANY

Nature of Business

Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), is a luxury home furnishings retailer that offers a growing number of categories including furniture, lighting, textiles, bathware, décor, outdoor and garden, tableware and children’s furnishings. These products are sold through the Company’s stores, catalogs and websites. As of November 2, 2013, the Company operated a total of 70 retail stores and 17 outlet stores in 29 states, the District of Columbia and Canada, and had sourcing operations in Shanghai and Hong Kong.

The Company was formed on August 18, 2011 and capitalized on September 2, 2011 as a holding company for the purposes of facilitating an initial public offering of common equity and was a direct subsidiary of Home Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Home Holdings”) until May 20, 2013.

On November 1, 2012, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Restoration Hardware, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Restoration Hardware, Inc. became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Restoration Hardware, Inc. was a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Home Holdings prior to the Company’s initial public offering. Outstanding units issued by Home Holdings under its equity compensation plan, referred to as the Team Resto Ownership Plan, were replaced with common stock of the Company at the time of its initial public offering. These transactions are referred to as the “Reorganization.” As a result of these transactions, as of November 1, 2012, 32,188,891 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding.

On November 7, 2012, the Company completed its initial public offering. In connection with its initial public offering, the Company issued and sold 4,782,609 shares of its common stock at a price of $24.00 per share. In addition, certain of the Company’s stockholders sold an aggregate of 381,723 shares of common stock held by them in the initial public offering. Further, certain stockholders sold an additional aggregate of 774,650 shares of common stock held by them pursuant to the exercise by the offering’s underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of stock by its stockholders.

Prior to the Reorganization, Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc. had not engaged in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and the Reorganization. Accordingly, all financial and other information herein relating to periods prior to the completion of the Reorganization is that of Restoration Hardware, Inc.

On May 20, 2013, the Company completed a follow-on offering of 9,974,985 shares of common stock at an offering price of $50.00 per share, which included 1,301,085 shares sold in connection with the full exercise of the option to purchase additional shares granted to the underwriters. All of the shares sold in the offering were sold by existing stockholders of the Company. No shares were sold by the Company in the offering, and, as such, the Company did not receive any of the proceeds from such sales. Effective May 20, 2013, the Company ceased being a subsidiary of Home Holdings, as a result of the sale, by Home Holdings, of a majority of our voting common stock.

On July 17, 2013, the Company completed a second follow-on offering of 8,000,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $70.00 per share. On August 14, 2013, in connection with the full exercise of the option to purchase additional shares granted to the underwriters, an additional 1,200,000 shares were sold at a price of $70.00 per share. All of the shares sold in the offering were sold by existing stockholders of the Company. No shares were sold by the Company in the offering, and, as such, the Company did not receive any of the proceeds from such sales.

During the nine months ended November 2, 2013, the Company determined that lease agreements for three future Full Line Design Gallery locations met the capitalization criteria under ASC 840, Leases. As a result, the Company recorded $24.7 million related to build-to-suit transactions, which is recorded within property and equipment, and other long-term obligations on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, during the nine months ended November 2, 2013, the Company recorded $0.6 million related to interest expense for these build-to-suit transactions.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the Company’s records and, in management’s opinion, include all adjustments necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position as of November 2, 2013, and the results of operations for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012, and changes of cash flows for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012. The Company’s current fiscal year ends on February 1, 2014 (“fiscal 2013”).

6

Table of Contents

Certain information and disclosures normally included in the notes to annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted for purposes of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013 (“fiscal 2012”).

The results of operations for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2013 presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

NOTE 2—RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The FASB is currently working on amendments to existing accounting standards governing a number of areas including, but not limited to, accounting for leases. In May 2013, the FASB issued a new exposure draft, Leases (the “Exposure Draft”), which would replace the existing guidance in ASC Topic 840, Leases. Under the Exposure Draft, among other changes in practice, a lessee’s rights and obligations under most leases, including existing and new arrangements, would be recognized as assets and liabilities, respectively, on the balance sheet. Other significant provisions of the Exposure Draft include (i) defining the “lease term” to include the noncancellable period together with periods for which there is a significant economic incentive for the lessee to extend or not terminate the lease; (ii) defining the initial lease liability to be recorded on the balance sheet to contemplate only those variable lease payments that depend on an index or that are in substance “fixed”; and (iii) a dual approach for determining whether lease expense is recognized on a straight-line or accelerated basis, depending on whether the lessee is expected to consume more than an insignificant portion of the leased asset’s economic benefits. The comment period for the Exposure Draft ended on September 13, 2013. If and when effective, this Exposure Draft will likely have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, as the standard-setting process is still ongoing, the Company is unable to determine the impact this proposed change in accounting standards will have on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3—PREPAID EXPENSE AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid expense and other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):

NOTE 4—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following sets forth the goodwill and intangible assets as of November 2, 2013 (dollar amounts in thousands):

7

Table of Contents

The following sets forth the goodwill and intangible assets as of February 2, 2013 (dollar amounts in thousands):

NOTE 5—ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):

Accounts payable includes negative cash balances due to outstanding checks of $20.2 million and $28.1 million as of November 2, 2013 and February 2, 2013, respectively.

NOTE 6—OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

Other long-term liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

NOTE 7—LINE OF CREDIT

As of November 2, 2013, $108.2 million was outstanding under the revolving line of credit and the undrawn borrowing availability under the revolving line of credit was $290.6 million. There were $18.0 million and $19.5 million in outstanding letters of credit as of November 2, 2013 and February 2, 2013, respectively.

8

Table of Contents

Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are subject to interest, at the borrowers’ option, at either the bank’s reference rate or LIBOR (or the BA Rate or the Canadian Prime Rate, as such terms are defined in the credit agreement, for Canadian borrowings denominated in Canadian dollars, or the United States Index Rate or LIBOR for Canadian borrowings denominated in United States dollars) plus an applicable margin rate, in each case. The weighted-average interest rate for the revolving line of credit was 2.9% as of November 2, 2013.

The credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants, including, among others, limitations on the ability to incur liens, make loans or other investments, incur additional debt, issue additional equity, merge or consolidate with or into another person, sell assets, pay dividends or make other distributions, or enter into transactions with affiliates, along with other restrictions and limitations typical to credit agreements of this type and size. As of November 2, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit agreement.

NOTE 8—INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate was 55.99% and (274.75)% for the three months ended November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012, respectively. The effective tax rate was 11.07% and (4.09)% for the nine months ended November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2013 was primarily due to non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, the fact that the Company is no longer recording a U.S. valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets, and other non-deductible expenses. Additionally, the effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 reflected a net favorable income tax benefit due to the reversal of income tax contingencies resulting from the conclusion of a Canadian audit examination.

As of the end of fiscal year 2012, the Company’s U.S. operations achieved a position of cumulative profits (adjusted for permanent differences) for the most recent three-year period. The Company concluded that this record of cumulative profitability in recent years, coupled with its business plan for profitability in future periods, provided assurance that its future tax benefits more likely than not would be realized. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company released all of its U.S. valuation allowance of $57.2 million against net deferred tax assets.

As of November 2, 2013, the Company has retained a valuation allowance of $0.3 million against deferred tax assets for its Shanghai operations.

As of November 2, 2013 and February 2, 2013, $1.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of the exposures related to unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if realized and are included in other long-term obligations on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. These amounts are primarily associated with foreign tax exposures that would, if realized, reduce the amount of net operating losses that would ultimately be utilized. As of November 2, 2013, $0.4 million of the exposures related to unrecognized tax benefits are expected to decrease in the next 12 months due to the lapse of the statute of limitations.

Adjustments required upon adoption of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes related to deferred tax asset accounts were offset by the related valuation allowance. Future changes to the Company’s assessment of the realizability of those deferred tax assets will impact the effective tax rate. The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to exposures as a component of income tax expense. The Company has accrued $0.3 million and $0.5 million of interest expense associated with exposures as of November 2, 2013 and February 2, 2013, respectively.

NOTE 9—EARNINGS PER SHARE

For the three months ended November 2, 2013, options and restricted stock units of 1,294,006 and 37,662, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended November 2, 2013, basic and diluted shares were equal as the Company was in a loss position. The Company did not have any anti-dilutive securities in the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 because all securities granted in those periods were granted by Home Holdings.

The weighted-average number of shares for the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 is calculated by giving effect to the capitalization of Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc., as if such event had been completed as of the beginning of the periods.

NOTE 10—SHARE REPURCHASES

Certain options and awards granted under the Company’s ownership and stock plans contain a repurchase right, which may be exercised at the Company’s discretion in the event that the employee terminates employment with the Company. During the three months ended November 2, 2013, the Company repurchased 37,883 shares of common stock from former employees. The shares were purchased at a weighted-average price of $66.64 per share and were settled with the issuance of promissory notes bearing interest at 5%, paid annually, with principal due at the end of the 10-year term. As of November 2, 2013, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the promissory notes was approximately $2.5 million.

9

Table of Contents

NOTE 11—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with applicable guidance, which requires the Company to estimate the value of securities issued based upon an option-pricing model and recognize this estimated value as compensation expense over the vesting periods.

Stock-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $1.6 million and $0.4 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012, respectively. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $65.8 million and $1.1 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012, respectively. No stock-based compensation cost has been capitalized in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company recognizes expense associated with performance-based awards when it becomes probable that the performance condition will be met. Once it becomes probable that an award will vest, the Company recognizes compensation expense for employees of the Company equal to the number of shares which have vested multiplied by the fair value of the related shares measured at the grant date. In connection with the Reorganization and initial public offering, Mr. Friedman received shares of unvested stock in replacement of certain performance-based units. These units were marked to market every period through the satisfaction of the vesting criteria in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation, due to his advisory role of Creator and Curator from October 2012 to June 2013. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to performance-based awards of $29.9 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013, which is included in the total stock-based compensation amounts above. No expense was recorded related to performance-based awards in the three months ended November 2, 2013 or in the three or nine months ended October 27, 2012.

2012 Stock Option Plan and 2012 Stock Incentive Plan

On July 2, 2013, in connection with Mr. Friedman’s reappointment as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, the Company granted a stock option to Mr. Friedman under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan to purchase 1,000,000 shares of its common stock, with an exercise price of $75.43, which is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. This option was fully vested as of the date of grant but any shares issued upon exercise of the option will be subject to selling restrictions which are scheduled to lapse in three equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. The fully vested option resulted in a one-time non-cash stock-based compensation charge of $33.7 million recorded during the three month period ended August 3, 2013.

As of November 2, 2013, 9,410,530 options were outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $46.02 per share and 8,931,530 options were vested with a weighted-average exercise price of $45.59 per share. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, options vested or expected to vest, and options exercisable as of November 2, 2013 was $219.8 million, $219.8 million, and $212.7 million, respectively. Stock options exercisable as of November 2, 2013 had a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 9.08 years. As of November 2, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options was $8.3 million, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of 4.11 years.

As of November 2, 2013, the Company had 273,283 unvested restricted stock unit awards with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $65.21 per share. During the three and nine months ended November 2, 2013, 6,666 restricted stock unit awards with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $39.00 per share vested. As of November 2, 2013, there was $14.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock unit awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.90 years.

2012 Equity Replacement Plan

In connection with the Reorganization, the Board of Directors adopted the Restoration Hardware 2012 Equity Replacement Plan (the “Replacement Plan”), and outstanding units under the Team Resto Ownership Plan were replaced with vested and unvested shares of common stock under the Replacement Plan, in some cases subject to selling restrictions.

A portion of the shares issued under the Replacement Plan were unvested restricted shares issued to Carlos Alberini and Gary Friedman, the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officers, in replacement of certain of their performance-based units granted under the Team Resto Ownership Plan. With respect to the 1,331,548 shares received by Mr. Alberini and Mr. Friedman in replacement of certain of their performance-based units, such shares began to vest during the period following the initial public offering when the price of the Company’s common stock reached a 10-day average closing price per share of $31.00 for at least 10 consecutive trading days, and such shares fully vested when the price of the Company’s common stock reached a 10-day average closing price per share of $46.50 for at least 10 consecutive trading days. In addition, with respect to the 512,580 shares received by Mr. Alberini and Mr. Friedman in replacement of certain of their performance-based units, such shares began to vest during the period following the initial public offering when the 10-day average closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeded the initial public offering price of $24.00 per share for at least 10 consecutive trading days, and such shares fully vested when the 10-day average closing price of the Company’s common stock reached a price per share of $31.00 for at least 10 consecutive trading days.

10

Table of Contents

During the three and six months ended August 3, 2013, 748,159 shares and 888,616 shares of the 1,331,548 shares received by Mr. Alberini and Mr. Friedman in replacement of certain of their performance-based units vested in accordance with the performance objectives described above. As all of these shares received by Mr. Alberini and Mr. Friedman had vested as of August 3, 2013, no additional compensation expense was recorded in the three months ended November 2, 2013.

In October 2012, Mr. Friedman resigned from his positions of Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer and entered into an advisory services agreement that provided for Mr. Friedman to advise the Company in his role as the Creator and Curator with respect to product development, merchandising and other creative matters. In July 2013, Mr. Friedman was reappointed by the Company as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer. In connection with the Reorganization and initial public offering, Mr. Friedman received 1,185,511 shares of unvested stock in replacement of certain performance-based units. These units were marked to market every period through the satisfaction of the vesting criteria in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation, due to his advisory role as Creator and Curator from October 2012 to June 2013. As all such shares were vested as of June 2013, no expense related to these awards was recorded during the three months ended November 2, 2013. During the nine months ended November 2, 2013, the Company recorded non-cash compensation charges of $29.5 million related to these awards.

NOTE 12—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On July 2, 2013, at the time of Mr. Friedman’s reappointment as Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, Mr. Friedman and Hierarchy, LLC (“Hierarchy”), a newly formed entity in which Mr. Friedman had a controlling interest, waived all of Home Holdings’ obligations to invest in Hierarchy and all of Home Holdings’ rights with respect to Hierarchy were canceled, and the Company subsequently acquired all the outstanding interests of Hierarchy. As a result of the acquisition of Hierarchy, in the three months ended August 3, 2013 the Company wrote off all outstanding receivables in connection with certain consulting services provided to Hierarchy, and recorded a charge of $0.2 million.

NOTE 13—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

The Company has no off balance sheet commitments as of November 2, 2013.

Contingencies

The Company is involved in lawsuits, claims and proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its business. These disputes, are increasing in number as the business expands and the Company grows larger. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. As a result, the outcome of matters in which the Company is involved could result in unexpected expenses and liability that could adversely affect the Company’s operations. In addition, any claims against the Company, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources.

The Company reviews the need for any loss contingency reserves and establishes reserves when, in the opinion of management, it is probable that a matter would result in liability, and the amount of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated. Generally, in view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of those matters, particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages, it is not possible to determine whether a liability has been incurred or to reasonably estimate the ultimate or minimum amount of that liability until the case is close to resolution, in which case no reserve is established until that time. As of November 2, 2013, we have recorded a liability for the estimated loss related to these disputes. There is a possibility that additional losses may be incurred in excess of the amounts that we have accrued. However, we believe that the ultimate resolution of these current matters will not have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 14—SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company defines an operating segment on the same basis that it uses to evaluate performance internally by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). The Company has determined that the Co-Chief Executive Officers (or Chief Executive Officer during the time period in which Mr. Friedman did not hold such position) are its CODM and there is one operating segment. Therefore, the Company reports as a single segment. This includes all sales channels accessed by the Company’s customers, including sales through catalogs, sales through the Company’s website and sales through the Company’s stores.

11

Table of Contents

The Company classifies its sales into furniture and non-furniture product lines. Furniture includes both indoor and outdoor furniture. Non-furniture includes lighting, textiles, accessories and home décor. Net revenues in each category were as follows (in thousands):

The Company is domiciled in the United States and operates stores in the United States and Canada. Revenues from Canadian operations, and the long-lived assets in Canada, are not material to the Company. Geographic revenues are determined based upon where service is rendered.

No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues in the three or nine months ended November 2, 2013 or October 27, 2012.

NOTE 15—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On November 27, 2013, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement which is expected to close on February 3, 2014, upon which the Company will acquire certain assets for a purchase price of $2.5 million. This agreement was entered into with a company that is owned by an employee of the Company.

12

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of our operations should be read together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in our most recent Form 10-K filed on April 29, 2013.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET DATA

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events.

Forward-looking statements are subject to risk and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected. We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based upon many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, or cautionary statements, are disclosed under the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in Part II of this quarterly report and in our most recent Form 10-K filed on April 29, 2013 (the “2012 Form 10-K”), “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this quarterly report. All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements, as well as other cautionary statements. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this quarterly report in the context of these risks and uncertainties.

We cannot assure you that we will realize the results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences or affect us or our operations in the way we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

Overview

We are a leading luxury retailer in the home furnishings marketplace. Our collections of timeless, updated classics and reproductions are presented consistently across our sales channels in sophisticated and unique lifestyle settings that we believe are on par with world-class interior designers. We offer dominant merchandise assortments across a growing number of categories, including furniture, lighting, textiles, bathware, décor, outdoor and garden, tableware and children’s furnishings. Our business is fully integrated across our multiple channels of distribution, consisting of our stores, catalogs and websites. We position our stores as showrooms for our brand, while our catalogs and websites act as virtual extensions of our stores. As of November 2, 2013, we operated a total of 70 retail stores, consisting of 62 Galleries, 5 Full Line Design Galleries and 3 Baby & Child Galleries, as well as 17 outlet stores throughout the United States and Canada.

13

Table of Contents

Basis of Presentation and Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our statements of operations and other financial and operating data.

On November 7, 2012, Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc. completed an initial public offering and acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Restoration Hardware, Inc. Outstanding units under the Team Resto Ownership Plan were exchanged for common stock of Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc. at the time of its initial public offering. These transactions are referred to as the “Reorganization.” Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc. has not engaged in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and the Reorganization. Accordingly, all financial and other information herein relating to periods prior to the completion of the Reorganization is that of Restoration Hardware, Inc.

14

Table of Contents

15

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total net revenues.

We operate a fully integrated distribution model through our stores, catalogs and websites. The following table shows a summary of our Stores revenues, which include all sales for orders placed in retail stores as well as sales through outlet stores, and our Direct revenues, which include sales through our catalogs and websites (in thousands).

Three Months Ended November 2, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended October 27, 2012

Net revenues

Net revenues increased $111.7 million, or 39%, to $395.8 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $284.2 million in the three months ended October 27, 2012. We had 70 and 73 retail stores open at November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012, respectively. Stores sales increased $52.8 million, or 33%, to $212.0 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $159.2 million in the three months ended October 27, 2012 due in large part to our comparable store sales increase of 29% over the same period. Direct sales increased $58.9 million, or 47%, to $183.9 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $125.0 million in the three months ended October 27, 2012. We believe that the increase in both comparable store and direct sales was due primarily to our customers’ favorable reaction to our merchandise assortment, including the expansion of existing product categories and the introduction of new product categories.

Gross profit

Gross profit increased $38.9 million, or 38%, to $140.8 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 from $101.9 million in the three months ended October 27, 2012.

Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues decreased 0.3% to 35.6% in the three months ended November 2, 2013 from 35.9% in the three months ended October 27, 2012. This decrease was primarily driven by strategic pricing on new product introductions, changes in product mix and increases in distribution center occupancy costs. These decreases in gross profit as a percentage of net revenues were partially offset by improvement in store occupancy costs from improved leverage on the fixed portion of such costs.

16

Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $17.1 million, or 17%, to $116.9 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $99.9 million in the three months ended October 27, 2012.

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily related to an increase in employment costs, an increase in credit card fees due to increased revenues and an increase in corporate occupancy costs. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in advertising and marketing costs as a result of modifying our Source Book strategy for fiscal 2013 and eliminating our Fall Sourcebook.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were 29.5% of net revenues for the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to 35.2% of net revenues for the three months ended October 27, 2012. The improvement in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues was primarily driven by the reduction in our advertising and marketing costs noted above, as well as lower professional fees and other corporate expenses as a percentage of sales. These reductions were partially offset by increased corporate occupancy costs.

Interest expense

Interest expense was $2.2 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $1.5 million in the three months ended October 27, 2012. This increase was primarily due to interest expense of $0.4 million related to accounting for three of our Full Line Design Galleries as build-to-suit transactions.

Income tax expense (benefit)

Income tax expense was $12.1 million in the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to a benefit of $1.2 million in the three months ended October 27, 2012. Our effective tax rate was 55.99% in the three months ended November 2, 2013 compared to (274.75)% in the three months ended October 27, 2012. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three months ended November 2, 2013 was primarily due to non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, the fact that the Company is no longer recording a U.S. valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets, and other non-deductible expenses. Additionally, the effective tax rate for the three months ended October 27, 2012 reflected a net favorable income tax benefit due to the reversal of income tax contingencies resulting from the conclusion of a Canadian audit examination.

Nine months Ended November 2, 2013 Compared to Nine months Ended October 27, 2012

Net revenues

Net revenues increased $284.3 million, or 36%, to $1.1 billion in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $795.0 million in the nine months ended October 27, 2012. We had 70 and 73 retail stores open at November 2, 2013 and October 27, 2012, respectively. Stores sales increased $142.5 million, or 33%, to $575.6 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $433.1 million in the nine months ended October 27, 2012 due in large part to our comparable store sales increase of 31% over the same period. Direct sales increased $141.8 million, or 39%, to $503.7 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $361.9 million in the nine months ended October 27, 2012. We believe that the increase in both comparable store and direct sales was due primarily to our customers’ favorable reaction to our merchandise assortment, including the expansion of existing product categories and the introduction of new product categories.

Gross profit

Gross profit increased $90.6 million, or 31%, to $381.9 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 from $291.3 million in the nine months ended October 27, 2012.

Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues decreased 1.3% to 35.4% in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 from 36.6% in the nine months ended October 27, 2012. This decrease was primarily driven by strategic pricing on new product introductions and changes in product mix. In addition, gross profit as a percentage of net revenues decreased due to increased freight costs resulting from a larger percentage of furniture sales during the period, which incur higher shipping costs than our other products. These decreases in gross profit as a percentage of net revenues were partially offset by improvement in store occupancy costs from improved leverage on the fixed portion of such costs.

17

Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $113.6 million, or 42%, to $385.3 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $271.7 million in the nine months ended October 27, 2012.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended November 2, 2013 included: (i) a $33.7 million non-cash compensation charge related to the one-time, fully vested option to Mr. Friedman upon his reappointment as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, (ii) a $29.5 million non-cash compensation charge related to the performance-based vesting of certain shares granted to Mr. Friedman in connection with the Reorganization and initial public offering, and (iii) $2.9 million of costs incurred in connection with our follow-on offerings in May 2013 and July 2013.

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding the one-time and non-cash compensation items mentioned above, was primarily related to an increase in employment costs, an increase in credit card fees due to increased revenues, an increase in corporate occupancy costs and an increase in Gallery preopening costs. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in advertising and marketing costs as a result of modifying our Source Book strategy for fiscal 2013 and eliminating our Fall Sourcebook. The increase was also offset by decreases in professional fees and other corporate expenses.

Excluding the one-time and non-cash compensations items for the nine months ended November 2, 2013 mentioned above, selling, general and administrative expenses were 29.6% of net revenues for the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to 34.1% of net revenues for the nine months ended October 27, 2012. The improvement in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues was primarily driven by a decrease in advertising and marketing costs as well as lower professional fees and other corporate expenses.

Interest expense

Interest expense was $4.2 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to $4.6 million in the nine months ended October 27, 2012. This decrease was primarily due to the repayment of the term loan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and a decrease in the average borrowings under the revolving line of credit in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to the nine months ended October 27, 2012. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $0.6 million related to accounting for three of our Full Line Design Galleries as build-to-suit transactions.

Income tax expense (benefit)

Income tax expense was $0.8 million in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to a benefit of $0.6 million in the nine months ended October 27, 2012. Our effective tax rate was 11.07% in the nine months ended November 2, 2013 compared to (4.09)% in the nine months ended October 27, 2012. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily due to non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, the fact that the Company is no longer recording a U.S. valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets, and other non-deductible expenses. Additionally, the effective tax rate for the nine months ended October 27, 2012 reflected a net favorable income tax benefit due to the reversal of income tax contingencies resulting from the conclusion of a Canadian audit examination.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our business relies on cash flows from operations and the revolving line of credit as our primary sources of liquidity. Our primary cash needs are for merchandise inventories, Source Books and other catalogs, payroll, store rent, capital expenditures associated with opening new stores and updating existing stores, as well as infrastructure and information technology. The most significant components of our working capital are merchandise inventories, capitalized catalog costs, accounts payable and other current liabilities. Our working capital is seasonal as a result of building inventory and paying for catalog costs for the key selling seasons, and as a result, our borrowings are generally higher during these periods when compared to the rest of our fiscal year. Our borrowings generally increase in our first fiscal quarter as we prepare for the outdoor selling season, which is in our second fiscal quarter, and they also generally increase in the third fiscal quarter as we prepare for the holiday selling season, which is in our fourth fiscal quarter. We believe that cash expected to be generated from operations and our availability to borrow under the revolving line of credit or other financing arrangements will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures and payments due under our revolving line of credit for at least the next 12 – 24 months. Our investments in capital expenditures for fiscal 2013 are planned at approximately $95 million to $100 million, of which $57.6 million was spent during the nine months ended November 2, 2013. Our fiscal 2013 capital expenditures will primarily be related to our efforts to continue our growth and expansion, including construction of Full Line Design Galleries and infrastructure investments.

18

Table of Contents

Cash Flow Analysis

The following table presents a summary of operating, investing, and financing activities (in thousands):

Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities

Cash from operating activities consists primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and the effect of changes in working capital and other activities.

For the nine months ended November 2, 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $30.5 million and consisted of non-cash items of $72.4 million offset by a net loss of $8.4 million and an increase in working capital and other activities of $33.5 million. Working capital and other activities consisted primarily of an increase in inventory of $95.0 million in anticipation of the 2013 fall and winter selling seasons and in order to improve our in-stock positions and reduce backorders, and an increase in prepaid expense of $10.1 million primarily due to increased catalog costs related to our Holiday 2013 and Spring 2014 Source Books. These uses of cash from working capital components were partially offset by increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $48.3 million primarily due to timing of payments, increases in other liabilities primarily related to an increase in income tax payables, and increases in deferred revenue and customers deposits of $9.6 million due to the timing of shipments made at fiscal quarter end and increased special orders.

For the nine months ended October 27, 2012, net cash used in operating activities was $20.0 million and consisted of an increase in working capital and other activities of $56.4 million, offset by net income of $15.6 million and non-cash items of $20.8 million. Working capital and other activities consisted primarily of increases in inventory of $87.9 million in anticipation of the 2012 fall and winter selling seasons, prepaid expenses of $35.2 million primarily due to an increase in catalog costs associated with the Fall 2012 Source Books, and accounts receivable of $7.3 million due to timing of payments received related to our credit card receivables. These uses of cash from working capital components were partially offset by increases in accrued liabilities and accounts payable of $48.5 million primarily due to timing of payments, increases in deferred revenue and customer deposits of $16.5 million due to the timing of shipments made at fiscal quarter end, and increases in deferred rent and lease incentives of $10.2 million due to construction of our new Boston location.

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

Investing activities consist primarily of investments in supply chain and systems infrastructure and capital expenditures related to growth and expansion, including construction of Full Line Design Galleries.

For the nine months ended November 2, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $57.6 million primarily as a result of investment in supply chain of $33.5 million, investments in new stores of $18.6 million and investment in systems infrastructure of $4.9 million.

For the nine months ended October 27, 2012, net cash used in investing activities was $25.9 million primarily as a result of investments in new stores of $13.9 million and investment in supply chain and systems infrastructure of $11.7 million and the purchase of a new domain name for $0.3 million.

Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities

Financing activities consist primarily of borrowings and repayments related to the revolving line of credit and capital leases.

For the nine months ended November 2, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities was $27.0 million primarily due to an increase in net borrowings under the revolving line of credit of $25.7 million, as well as net proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $1.4 million and excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options of $1.4 million. This overall increase in cash provided by financing activities was partially offset by payments on capital lease obligations of $1.4 million.

For the nine months ended October 27, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $53.0 million primarily due to an increase in net borrowings under the revolving line of credit of $65.2 million. This overall increase in cash provided by financing activities was partially offset by capitalized initial public offering costs of $9.1 million and payments on capital lease obligations of $3.1 million.

19

Table of Contents

Revolving Line of Credit

In August 2011, Restoration Hardware, Inc., along with its Canadian subsidiary, Restoration Hardware Canada, Inc., entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain other lenders. This credit agreement modified a previous facility under which Restoration Hardware, Inc. had a revolving line of credit for up to $190.0 million as of July 30, 2011. As a result of the modification, the unamortized deferred financing fees of $0.2 million related to the previous line of credit on the date of the modification will be amortized over the life of the new revolving line of credit, which has a maturity date of August 3, 2016. Under the credit agreement, Restoration Hardware, Inc. has a revolving line of credit available of up to $417.5 million (following Restoration Hardware, Inc.’s exercise of the commitment increase option on November 1, 2012, as described below), of which $10.0 million is available to Restoration Hardware Canada, Inc. The credit agreement was amended in January 2012 to add a $15.0 million term loan facility with a maturity date of July 6, 2015, which was repaid in full on November 7, 2012, as described below.

Under the credit agreement’s commitment increase provision, Restoration Hardware, Inc. had the option to increase the amount of the revolving line of credit by up to an additional $100.0 million, provided that, among other things, the existing lenders or additional lenders agreed to participate in the increased loan commitments under the revolving line of credit, no default under the credit agreement then existed or would result from such increase and sufficient borrowing base collateral was available to support increased loan amounts. On November 1, 2012, Restoration Hardware, Inc. increased the amount of the revolving line of credit by $100.0 million pursuant to this commitment increase provision.

On November 7, 2012, Restoration Hardware, Inc. made payments of $75.7 million on its revolving line of credit and repaid its outstanding term loan of $15.0 million in full. Such payments were funded from the proceeds received as a result of our initial public offering. Upon the repayment of the term loan in full, the remaining debt issuance costs of $0.2 million related to the term loan were expensed.

The availability of credit at any given time under the revolving line of credit is limited by reference to a borrowing base formula based upon numerous factors, including the value of eligible inventory, eligible accounts receivable, eligible real estate, and, in the case of the term loan, registered trade names and reserves established by the administrative agent. As a result of the borrowing base formula, the actual borrowing availability under the revolving line of credit could be less than the stated amount of the revolving line of credit (as reduced by the actual borrowings and outstanding letters of credit under the revolving line of credit). All obligations under the credit agreement are secured by substantially all of Restoration Hardware, Inc.’s assets, including accounts receivable, inventory, intangible assets, property, equipment, goods and fixtures.

Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are subject to interest, at borrowers’ option, at either the bank’s reference rate or LIBOR (or the BA Rate or the Canadian Prime Rate, as such terms are defined in the credit agreement, for Canadian borrowings denominated in Canadian dollars or the United States Index Rate or LIBOR for Canadian borrowings denominated in United States dollars) plus an applicable margin rate, in each case. The weighted-average interest rate for the revolving line of credit was 2.9% as of November 2, 2013.

As of November 2, 2013, $108.2 million was outstanding under the revolving line of credit and the undrawn borrowing availability under the revolving line of credit was $290.6 million. There were $18.0 million in outstanding letters of credit as of November 2, 2013.

The credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants, including, among others, limitations on the ability to incur liens, make loans or other investments, incur additional debt, issue additional equity, merge or consolidate with or into another person, sell assets, pay dividends or make other distributions or enter into transactions with affiliates, along with other restrictions and limitations typical to credit agreements of this type and size. The credit agreement does not contain any significant financial or coverage ratio covenants unless the availability under the revolving line of credit is less than the greater of (i) $17.5 million and (ii) 10% of the lesser of (A) the aggregate maximum commitments under the revolving line of credit and (B) the domestic borrowing base. If the availability under the revolving line of credit is less than the foregoing amount, then Restoration Hardware, Inc. is required to maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of at least one to one. Such ratio is approximately the ratio on the last day of each month on a trailing twelve-month basis of (a) (i) consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) minus (ii) capital expenditures, minus (iii) the income taxes paid in cash to (b) the sum of (i) debt service charges plus (ii) certain dividends and distributions paid. As of November 2, 2013, Restoration Hardware, Inc. was in compliance with all covenants, and if the availability under the revolving line of credit were less than the amount described above, Restoration Hardware, Inc. would have been in compliance with the consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio described in the previous sentence. The credit agreement requires a daily sweep of cash to prepay the loans under the credit agreement while (i) an event of default exists or (ii) the availability under the revolving line of credit for extensions of credit to Restoration Hardware, Inc. is less than the greater of (A) $20.0 million and (B) 15% of the lesser of the aggregate maximum commitments and the domestic borrowing base.

20

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

As of November 2, 2013, there were no material changes outside of the ordinary course of business to our contractual obligations described in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Contractual Obligations” section of our 2012 Form 10-K.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no material off balance sheet arrangements as of November 2, 2013.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes, as well as the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates its accounting policies, estimates, and judgments on an on-going basis. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions and such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

Management evaluated the development and selection of its critical accounting policies and estimates and believes that the following involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity and are most significant to reporting our results of operations and financial position, and are therefore discussed as critical:

For further discussion regarding these policies, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our 2012 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates listed in our 2012 Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2—Recent Accounting Pronouncements to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of recently proposed accounting standards which may impact our financial statements in future reporting periods.

21

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with borrowings under our revolving line of credit and, prior to its repayment on November 7, 2012, our term loan, which bear interest at variable rates. At November 2, 2013, $108.2 million was outstanding under the revolving line of credit and the undrawn borrowing availability under the revolving line of credit was $290.6 million. There were $18.0 million in outstanding letters of credit as of November 2, 2013. We currently do not engage in any interest rate hedging activity and we have no intention to do so in the foreseeable future. Based on the weighted-average interest rate on the revolving line of credit during the three and nine months ended November 2, 2013, and to the extent that borrowings were outstanding, we do not believe that a 10% change in the interest rate would have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Impact of Inflation

Our results of operations and financial condition are presented based on historical cost. While it is difficult to accurately measure the impact of inflation due to the imprecise nature of the estimates required, we believe the effects of inflation, if any, on our results of operations and financial condition have been immaterial.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Co-Principal Executive Officers and our Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

22

Table of Contents

PART II

From time to time we and/or our management are involved in litigation, claims and other proceedings relating to the conduct of our business, including but not limited to consumer protection class action litigation, claims related to our collection of reproductions, claims related to our employment practices, claims of intellectual property infringement, including with respect to trademarks and trade dress, and claims asserting unfair competition and unfair business practices by third parties. In addition, from time to time, we are subject to product liability and personal injury claims for the products that we sell and the stores we operate. Subject to certain exceptions, our purchase orders generally require the vendor to indemnify us against any product liability claims; however, if the vendor does not have insurance or becomes insolvent, we may not be indemnified. In addition, we could face a wide variety of employee claims against us, including general discrimination, privacy, labor and employment, ERISA and disability claims. Any claims could result in litigation against us and could also result in regulatory proceedings being brought against us by various federal and state agencies that regulate our business, including the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Often these cases raise complex factual and legal issues, which are subject to risks and uncertainties and which could require significant management time. Litigation and other claims and regulatory proceedings against us could result in unexpected expenses and liability and could also materially adversely affect our operations and our reputation.

We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, prospects, operating results or cash flows. In addition to information regarding risk factors that appears in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Forward-Looking Statements” in Part I, Item 2, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, and Part II, Items 7 and 7A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013 (the “2012 Form 10-K”). We have updated the risk factors identified below which were previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our 2012 Form 10-K and in Part II, Item 1A of our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 3, 2013, and we have added a risk factor concerning new regulations related to conflict minerals as noted below:

In addition, the risk factor entitled “Home Holdings, Catterton and Tower Three continue to have significant influence over us, including over decisions that require the approval of stockholders, and their interests in our business may be different from yours.” is no longer applicable to us.

23

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Business

If we lose key personnel or are unable to hire additional qualified personnel, our business may be harmed.

The success of our business depends upon the continued service of our key personnel, including our Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Gary Friedman. The loss of the services of our key personnel could make it more difficult to successfully operate our business and achieve our business goals. In addition, we do not maintain key man life insurance policies on any of our key personnel. As a result, we may not be able to cover the financial loss we may incur in losing the services of any of our key personnel.

Mr. Friedman’s equity ownership in our Company has given him a substantial amount of personal wealth. As a result, it may be difficult for us to continue to retain and motivate him, and this wealth could affect decisions about whether or not he will continue to perform services for us. If we do not succeed in retaining and motivating Mr. Friedman, we may be unable to achieve our historical growth rates.

Competition for qualified employees and personnel in the retail industry is intense. We may be unable to retain other existing personnel that are important to our business or hire additional qualified personnel. The process of locating personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to carry out our goals is often lengthy. Our success depends to a significant degree upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified management, marketing and sales personnel, in particular store managers, and upon the continued contributions of these people. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting and retaining qualified executives and personnel.

In addition, our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain a sufficient number of store employees who understand and appreciate our corporate culture and customers. Turnover in the retail industry is generally high. Excessive store employee turnover will result in higher employee costs associated with finding, hiring and training new store employees. If we are unable to hire and retain store personnel capable of consistently providing a high level of customer service, our ability to open new stores may be impaired, the performance of our existing and new stores could be materially adversely affected and our brand image may be negatively impacted.

Our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Carlos Alberini, recently resigned from his position as Co-Chief Executive Officer, which may harm our operations and expose us to significant financial obligations.

We recently announced that our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Carlos Alberini, resigned from his position as Co-Chief Executive Officer effective January 31, 2014. Mr. Alberini has been a key contributor to the Company’s recent success. While we plan to implement a transition plan and to search for a replacement for Mr. Alberini, the Company faces a variety of risks and uncertainties due to his resignation. Our business may experience adverse consequences as a result of his resignation and the resulting changes we make to our management organizational structure. A search for a new member of senior management may be long, costly and may divert the board of directors’ and management’s attention from other business concerns. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in finding a suitable replacement for Mr. Alberini or that we will not experience other disruptions in our management structure arising from transitions in our leadership, or changes in our management structure, including as a result of the resignation of Mr. Alberini or the retention, in the future, of new executives to assist Mr. Friedman in his role as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer.

Mr. Alberini owns a substantial number of shares of the Company and although he has indicated an intention to retain a significant ownership position in the Company, he may later determine to sell some or all of those shares, which could adversely impact the market price of our common stock. In addition, while Mr. Alberini’s employment and equity-related agreements provide the Company with the right, in connection with his resignation from the Company, to repurchase certain of the shares that may be held by Mr. Alberini and that are subject to selling restrictions, no determination has yet been made with respect to whether the Company will repurchase any such shares. If we elect to repurchase any of Mr. Alberini’s shares, this could result in the Company incurring substantial financial obligations to fund such repurchase.

Gary Friedman was recently re-appointed as our Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Friedman previously resigned from his positions as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer in October 2012 following an investigation by a special committee of non-management directors of the board and thereafter served as our advisor for approximately eight months. There can be no assurance that this transition will not have an adverse impact on us.

Effective July 2, 2013, Gary Friedman was appointed to serve as our Co-Chief Executive Officer along with Carlos Alberini, and at the time of effectiveness of Mr. Alberini’s resignation, Mr. Friedman will be serving as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Friedman also serves as Creator and Curator, and as Chairman of our Board of Directors. Mr. Friedman previously served as Chairman and as Co-Chief Executive Officer with Mr. Alberini from June 2010 through October 2012. Prior to June 2010, Mr. Friedman was our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. In October 2012, Mr. Friedman resigned as Co-Chief Executive Officer and as a director and agreed to serve in an advisory capacity as our Creator and Curator following an investigation by a special committee of non-management directors of the board assisted by independent counsel prompted by disclosure that Mr. Friedman and a Company employee were engaged in a personal relationship, described by the parties as consensual. The investigation concluded that Mr. Friedman engaged in activities that were inconsistent with the board of directors’ expectations for executive conduct as previously communicated by the board of directors and failed to comply with certain Company policies. We incurred $4.8 million of expenses related to the investigation. There can be no assurance that we will not incur expenses or claims in the future related to the conduct that was the subject of the investigation or similar conduct that has occurred in the past or, given Mr. Friedman’s continued involvement with the Company, may occur in the future.

There are claims made against us and/or our management from time to time that can result in litigation or regulatory proceedings which could distract management from our business activities and result in significant liability.

From time to time we and/or our management are involved in litigation, claims and other proceedings relating to the conduct of our business, including but not limited to consumer protection class action litigation, claims related to our collection of reproductions, claims related to our employment practices, claims of intellectual property infringement, including with respect to trademarks and trade dress, and claims asserting unfair competition and unfair business practices by third parties. In addition, from time to time, we are subject to product liability and personal injury claims for the products that we sell and the stores we operate. Subject to certain exceptions, our purchase orders generally require the vendor to indemnify us against any product liability claims; however, if the vendor does not have insurance or becomes insolvent, we may not be indemnified. In addition, we could face a wide variety of employee claims against us, including general discrimination, privacy, labor and employment, ERISA and disability claims. Any claims could result in litigation against us and could also result in regulatory proceedings being brought against us by various federal and state agencies that regulate our business, including the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Often these cases raise complex factual and legal issues, which are subject to risks and uncertainties and which could require significant management time. Our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Alberini was employed by Guess?, Inc., which was subject to a tax audit and assessment proceeding in Italy that was settled in January 2013. There was also a related proceeding by a prosecutor in Italy that had been initiated with respect to several current and former members of the Guess Europe management team as well as Mr. Alberini. In July 2013, the matter was closed based on the prosecutor’s recommendation. Litigation and other claims and regulatory proceedings against us or our management could result in unexpected expenses and liability and could also materially adversely affect our operations and our reputation.

New regulations related to “conflict minerals” may force us to incur additional expenses, may make the sourcing of our products more complex and may result in damage to our reputation with customers.

On August 22, 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”), the SEC adopted new requirements for companies that use certain minerals and metals in their products, known as “conflict minerals,” whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. Some of these minerals are commonly used in many products and may be used in some of the products we offer. These requirements require companies to diligence, disclose, and report whether such minerals, if used in the manufacture of the products of the company, originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. The implementation of these new requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability, and pricing of such minerals if they are found to be used in our products and necessary for their functionality. Since we source substantially all of our products abroad, we may not be able to sufficiently verify the origins of these minerals and metals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. The first report is due on May 31, 2014 for the 2013 calendar year.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Substantial future sales of our common stock, or the perception in the public markets that these sales may occur, may depress our stock price.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional shares. All of our outstanding shares of common stock are freely tradable, except for (i) 345,111 shares issued under our 2012 Equity Replacement Plan that are subject to additional time-based resale restrictions and (ii) any other shares of our common stock that are held or acquired by our directors, executive officers and other affiliates, as that term is defined in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), which are restricted securities under the Securities Act. If our existing stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or if the public perceives that such sales could occur, this could have an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock, even if there is no relationship between such sales and the performance of our business.

24

Table of Contents

In the future, we may also issue our securities in connection with a capital raise or acquisitions. The amount of shares of our common stock issued in connection with a capital raise or acquisition could constitute a material portion of our then-outstanding shares of our common stock, which would result in dilution.

Effective May 20, 2013, we ceased to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules upon completion of our May 2013 offering. However, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements during a one-year transition period until May 20, 2014.

Effective May 20, 2013, Home Holdings ceased to control a majority of our voting common stock. As a result, we ceased to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE corporate governance standards. In accordance with NYSE requirements, before we ceased to be a “controlled company,” we appointed at least one independent member to each of the compensation and nominating and governance committees. NYSE rules also require that we appoint at least a majority of independent members to such committees within 90 days of the date we ceased to be a “controlled company,” or August 13, 2013. We complied with this requirement within the period prescribed by the rules.

NYSE rules also require that we appoint compensation and nominating and governance committees composed entirely of independent directors and appoint a majority of independent directors to our board of directors within one year of such date, or May 20, 2014. During these transition periods, we may elect not to comply with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements, including:

Accordingly, during this transition period, stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such corporate governance requirements.

Repurchases of Common Stock during the Three Months Ended November 2, 2013

The following table provides information with respect to shares of common stock we repurchased during the three months ended November 2, 2013. For additional information, please see Note 10 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements within Part I of this Form 10-Q. These repurchases are related to certain options and awards granted under the Company’s ownership and stock plans that contain a repurchase right.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

25

Table of Contents

26

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

27